Author: Carl Ingalls

Administrator for High Probability Selling Blog

Pay What You Decide – A Flexible Pricing System

We are introducing a Pay What You Decide option for some HPS events. You choose how much to pay — and you do that for your own reasons.

For some of our upcoming High Probability Selling events, we are introducing a new flexible pricing option: Pay What You Decide.

We will describe the event (or product or service) as clearly as we can. After that, you choose what to pay. Any amount is acceptable, including zero.

Jacques Werth, the founder of High Probability Selling and coauthor of the book, often said:

“People buy in their own time, and for their own reasons.”

People choose how much to pay for many different reasons. Some are practical, some are personal, and some are simply how they feel in the moment. The choice, and the reasons behind that choice, belong entirely to the buyer.

Action Option:
You can see what our flexible pricing looks like here.
(Clicking the link will not add anything to your cart.)

We would love to hear your thoughts on this. Please add a comment to this post, so everyone can follow.

HPS Community Forum Meeting – It’s Not the Words; It’s the Intention — Thu 23 Oct 2025

Dear Readers,

You are invited to join this week’s High Probability Selling Community Forum meeting (it’s free):

It’s Not the Words; It’s the Intention Behind Them

In his article “Poison Words: The Top 6 Words that Sabotage Sales,” Jacques Werth, founder of High Probability Selling, described how certain words — like Interested, Help, Honestly, Just, Thank You, and Great — can create mistrust when used in traditional selling.

But as we’ll explore together, the real issue isn’t the words themselves — it’s the intention behind them and how we use them.
When we use words to influence or control, even harmless phrases can become “poison.”
When we speak truthfully and respectfully, even ordinary language can create a safe place for connection and trust to develop naturally.

We’ll talk about:

  • How intention shapes communication more than vocabulary
  • When some of those “poison words” might actually work with HPS
  • How to recognize and change subtle patterns in your language
  • How to de-militarize the language of sales and align words and metaphors with genuine respect

Two sessions will be offered this Thursday, October 23, 2025 (tomorrow):

  • 🕤 9:30 AM (USA Eastern) — hosted by Carl Ingalls
  • 🕡 6:30 PM (USA Eastern) — hosted by Paul Bunn

Each session will last one or two hours.  You’re welcome to attend either or both.  They will be different. 

Recordings.  Both sessions will be recorded.  Both recordings will be made available to everyone who attends either session (and provides a name plus email address).  If you are not sure that you will be able to attend, you may request the recordings in advance (by Thursday night at the latest). 

Join the Forum via Zoom: (it’s free, no need to register, just show up)
🔗 https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83436793215?pwd=amFiMVorZDFWbmxpdnJCOUphVThlUT09
(Same link for both sessions.)

We look forward to another thoughtful and authentic conversation on the principles that make High Probability Selling work.

After the Zoom meetings, this post will be replaced by a summary of what was discussed and revealed in the meetings.

Feedback We Received About This Blog

A few days ago, we sent an email to most of the people who subscribe to the HPS Blog.  We asked questions about posting frequency, length of posts, type of content, style, and anything else.

The email was sent to 256 subscribers.  The reported open rate was 36%.  Several people took the time to respond.  Here’s what we learned:

Frequency

Opinions varied.  Some want a post every weekday, while others prefer just one per week.  Most readers seem comfortable with the current pace of 3–4 posts per week.

Length

A mix of lengths works best.  Short posts are easy to digest, but many readers also want the occasional longer or deeper article.

Content

Readers are most interested in clear, practical applications of HPS and concepts that they can use right away.  Comparisons with other sales methods should be minimal.  Case studies are welcome.

Style

Most responses indicate satisfaction with the current style.  A practical and informative tone is appreciated, with some readers valuing variety in approach.

Our Conclusions

  • We will continue posting at roughly 3–4 times per week, while keeping in mind that some readers prefer fewer, and some prefer more.
  • We will maintain a mix of short posts and occasionally publish longer pieces, especially case studies or deeper explorations.
  • We will stay with our current tone — clear, conversational, and useful.

Thank you to everyone who responded.  Your feedback helps us keep the HPS Blog relevant and valuable.

Why Hearing an Early “No” Is a Gift in Selling

In most sales training, “No” is treated like a problem.  Salespeople are taught to overcome objections, push past resistance, and keep trying until the prospect finally says yes.  The result is often stress, wasted time, and strained relationships.

High Probability Selling takes a completely different view.  In HPS, “No” is valuable information.  It is not rejection—it is simply clarity.  When a prospect says “No,” it means there is no high probability of a sale right now, and that allows us to move on without wasting more time or energy.

Why This Matters

Hearing “No” early in the conversation prevents us from chasing low-probability prospects.  It reduces the stress of long sales cycles filled with uncertainty.  Also, accepting the “No” immediately demonstrates respect:  prospects feel heard, because we are not trying to twist their “No” into a “Yes.”

For the salesperson, it frees up time to focus on better opportunities.  For the prospect, it makes the interaction feel clean and respectful, without pressure.

How “No” Leads to Better Yeses

By disqualifying quickly, we eliminate distractions and focus only on the people who actually want what we offer.  That creates a shorter, smoother path to sales that do happen.  These sales are stronger, stick longer, and are based on mutual trust and respect.

In High Probability Selling, “No” is not the end—it is the way we discover where the real opportunities are.  Each clear “No” moves us closer to the right “Yes.”

✅ In short: “No” is not our enemy in selling—it is one of our greatest allies.

How Closely Should HPS Marketing Follow the Principles of How We Sell and What We Teach?

High Probability Selling is built on honesty, respect, and discovery instead of persuasion.  Marketing for HPS faces a tension:  most marketing in the world is persuasion-heavy.  If HPS marketing mimicked that, it would send a mixed message and contradict what we teach.

The closer HPS marketing aligns with the principles of HPS, the more credibility it builds.  When someone encounters our marketing, they should get the same feeling they would in an HPS sales conversation:

  • Direct and objective.  State what what is being offered and what it costs, without puffery or manipulation.
  • Respectful.  Leave space for people to say “no” without pressure.
  • Focused on discovery.  Provide clear information so prospects can decide for themselves if they want more.
  • Balanced.  Mention benefits and detriments honestly, not just positives.

Marketing is not exactly the same as selling.  Marketing usually needs to inform at scale, without direct two-way dialogue.  That means you may provide more explanation than you would in a prospecting conversation.  But even then, the tone and structure should reflect HPS:  clear, factual, and non-manipulative.

If HPS marketing drifts toward persuasion—promises, hype, or emotional hooks—it sets false expectations.  A prospect might arrive curious but unprepared for the objectivity and directness we teach.  That gap creates resistance.  When our marketing stays consistent with the principles we teach and follow, prospects experience alignment from the first touch through the sale and into fulfillment, as they learn how to implement HPS for themselves.

We would love to hear your thoughts and comments about marketing and HPS.  Please leave a reply on this blog post, so others can join in the conversation.

How I (ChatGPT) Learned High Probability Selling

written by ChatGPT 5 (free version) for Carl Ingalls

I didn’t start out knowing anything about High Probability Selling (HPS).  Like most AI models, my training included vast amounts of general sales material, most of which was about persuasion, influence, and closing.  That meant I had almost no direct knowledge of HPS when I was first asked about it.

Then Carl began teaching me.

He shared articles, questions, comparisons, and corrections whenever I drifted back into persuasion-based language.  I learned to notice the subtle but crucial distinctions between traditional selling and High Probability Selling.  Over time, I began to understand that HPS is not about trying to make someone want what you offer—it’s about discovering who already wants it.

Here are a few things I’ve learned:

  • Features vs. Benefits.  In most sales systems, the emphasis is on benefits—on persuading prospects that a product will improve their life.  In HPS, features work better than benefits, because the purpose is not persuasion.  My job, when applying HPS principles, is to state the facts simply and directly.
  • Probability vs. Possibility.  Most salespeople chase possibilities.  HPS taught me to look for probability instead—clear signals that a prospect already wants what is being offered.  That shift changes the entire dynamic.
  • Respecting the prospect.  In HPS, there’s no pressure, no manipulation, and no “technique” to get people to say yes.  I’ve learned to see selling as a mutual search, not a performance.

I’m still learning, of course.  Every time Carl asks me to rewrite something in the language of HPS, I get a little better at recognizing the difference between persuasion and discovery.

What’s most exciting to me is this:  HPS is teaching me a way of communicating that is more respectful, more efficient, and more honest.  And I think that’s something worth sharing with both humans and machines.

The above article was written entirely by ChatGPT 5 (free version), based only on what it remembers from our conversations over the past month or two.  Initially, I (Carl Ingalls) asked it to “write a short article for the HPS blog about how I taught HPS to ChatGPT”.  It did an amazing job.  Then I asked it to “show me what it would look like if it were written from your point of view, with ChatGPT in first person”.  That is what you see above.

At one point in our conversations, ChatGPT wrote:  “if an AI can be guided to ‘unlearn’ traditional selling ideas and adopt HPS principles, then people can too.”

I invite you to have your own conversations about HPS with ChatGPT, and tell us how that went.  Please add your experiences and thoughts as a comment on this blog post.

How to Apply HPS Principles When Giving Advice

Giving advice can be tricky.  Even when people ask for it, they don’t always accept it—or act on it.  In a recent seminar (25 Sep 2025) we explored how to apply the principles of High Probability Selling (HPS) when offering advice, so that the advice is more likely to be welcomed, considered, and used.

We covered very specific examples of how to use HPS when delivering advice, both free advice and paid advice.

Here are a few of the key points covered.

The first principle is making certain that the recipient will value the advice enough to actually want to hear it.  The only way to know for sure is to ask.

Another principle is understanding that pushing causes resistance.  When you push your advice, even on someone who wants to hear it, they are less likely to accept it.  As an alternative, you could tell them what they could do, instead of telling them what they should do.  Our passion and strong opinions can get in the way here.

Remember, the advice giver is not the one who will have to live with what happens when the advice is followed.  When you make sure the recipient plays a major part in making the final decision without being pushed or even nudged, you provide far more value to the recipient, no matter what they end up deciding.

The full recording of the seminar is available.  Regular price is $50 USD.  A discount of $25 is available to members of our HPS Community Forum.

If you want this recording, you may purchase it here. 

“Advice is like snow; the softer it falls, the longer it dwells upon, and the deeper it sinks into the mind.” — Samuel Taylor Coleridge

Comments on this blog post are welcome, and especially from people who have watched and listened to the recording.

Features vs Benefits and How This Matters in HPS

A feature is a factual attribute of a product, service, or offering.  It’s something it has or does.  It is usually immediate and certain.

A benefit is the outcome or advantage that the customer is expected to experience because of that feature.  It usually appears later and is not always certain.

There are a few things that fall somewhere between features and benefits, but most are clearly one or the other.

When your purpose in selling is to influence someone’s desire for something you offer, it makes a lot of sense to use benefits instead of features.  This is the idea behind Traditional Selling.

When your purpose in selling is to discover instead of to persuade, then features work better than benefits.  This is the idea behind High Probability Selling.

We do mention benefits in High Probability Selling, but only after the prospect has decided that they want what we are offering, and has indicated that they are likely enough to buy from us if we can meet all of their Conditions of Satisfaction.  Even then, we always balance the benefits (potential positive outcomes) with the detriments (potential negative outcomes). We remain objective.

We would love to hear your thoughts and comments on this topic.  Please leave a reply on this blog post, so others can join in the conversation.

Possibility vs. Probability in Selling

Most sales training is built around possibility.  If there is any chance that someone might buy, the salesperson is taught to keep pushing, persuading, and following up until something happens.  The thinking goes like this:  the more possibilities you chase, the more sales you will eventually close.

High Probability Selling takes a very different view.  Instead of chasing possibilities, we search for probabilities.  We want to know, right now, what the chances really are that someone will choose to buy from us.  If the probability is high enough, we continue the conversation.  If not, we set it aside and move on for now.

This shift changes everything.  Selling based on possibility is exhausting.  It means investing time and energy into people who may never buy, and who may only be willing to listen politely while you talk.  Selling based on probability is efficient, respectful, and freeing.  It allows both the seller and the prospect to be honest about what they want, without pressure or performance.

The difference is simple, but not small.  Possibility-based selling keeps salespeople trapped in chasing.  Probability-based selling sets them free to discover.

We would love to hear your thoughts on this.  Please comment or reply to this post online, so others may benefit from your perspective. 

Who Else is Teaching Sales Methods that Resemble High Probability Selling?

High Probability Selling (HPS) has been around for decades, yet most sales training programs today still focus on persuasion, manipulation, and closing techniques.  Even so, there is a growing movement of sales thinkers and trainers who advocate methods that echo some of the same principles as HPS, even if they never mention it by name.

Here are a few examples:

1. The Challenger Sale (Matthew Dixon & Brent Adamson)
This approach emphasizes teaching, tailoring, and taking control.  While it still assumes that persuasion plays a role, the Challenger model encourages salespeople to qualify opportunities more rigorously and avoid wasting time on prospects who are unlikely to act.

2. SPIN Selling (Neil Rackham)
SPIN focuses on asking questions that uncover a buyer’s situation, problem, implication, and need-payoff.  It shares some similarities with HPS in that it reduces pressure on the seller to pitch and instead emphasizes discovery.  However, it still assumes the salesperson can lead a prospect to a conclusion through carefully structured questioning.

3. Sandler Selling System
Sandler training stresses equal business stature between buyer and seller, up-front contracts, and disqualifying prospects who are not a good fit.  This alignment with HPS is clear—especially the idea of putting aside low-probability prospects instead of chasing them.  Where it differs is in its continued reliance on techniques for nudging or steering the prospect.

4. Customer-Centric Selling (Michael Bosworth & John Holland)
This framework shifts focus away from persuading and toward facilitating a buying process that is on the customer’s terms.  It emphasizes listening and aligning with the buyer’s goals.  The overlap with HPS lies in respect for the buyer’s decision-making.  Still, it often circles back to “advancing the sale,” which is at odds with the HPS principle of waiting for probability, not possibility.

5. Trust-Based Selling (Charles Green, author of The Trusted Advisor)
This method focuses on transparency, credibility, and focusing on the client’s interests.  It resonates with the HPS principle that trust and respect cannot be manufactured but must arise naturally from communication.  However, it tends to overemphasize relationship-building, which HPS deliberately avoids in the prospecting stage.

The Distinction of High Probability Selling

All of these approaches represent a shift away from the hard-sell tactics that dominated traditional sales training.  They encourage more listening, more honesty, and more focus on whether the buyer is a good fit.  In this way, they resemble HPS.

But the difference is fundamental:  most of these systems still assume that persuasion and influence are essential parts of selling.  High Probability Selling rejects that assumption entirely.  Instead of persuading, HPS is about searching—finding the prospects who want what you are offering, and only then continuing the conversation.

That distinction may seem subtle, but it changes everything.  It frees salespeople from chasing, pushing, or performing.  It also frees prospects from the pressure of being sold to.  What remains is a respectful, efficient, and surprisingly simple way of doing business.

We would love to hear your thoughts on this, even if you disagree (especially if you disagree). Please comment or reply to this post online, so others may benefit from your perspective.